Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Setting rpath on llvmjit.so?
Date: 2018-04-17 19:56:14
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY53vKX5TTEjhCcLFxETatTCguACS98BgkwMDcVnU2y9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 5:13 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> The half unmaintainedness of autoconf (no release in five years counts
> as that imo), sure makes it look like a good idea to move on to cmake or
> such at some point...

I don't necessarily see that as a reason to move. If we're hitting
bugs in autoconf that are causing problems, and we can't get them
fixed in the upstream, that's a reason. But switching build systems
won't be frictionless, so I'm not in favor of it unless there's a
clear payoff.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-04-17 19:59:34 Repeated crashes in GENERATED ... AS IDENTITY tests
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-17 19:52:29 Append's first_partial_plan