| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: our checks for read-only queries are not great |
| Date: | 2020-01-16 20:22:28 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY4rH-oUOW6qw2btvJC4fCMo55NET2nx77rBC7JTjnQWg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 12:22 PM Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I think I agree with you regarding the original intent, though even
> there, as discussed elsewhere, it seems like there's perhaps either a
> bug or a disagreement about the specifics of what that means when it
> relates to committing a 2-phase transaction. Still, setting that aside
> for the moment, do we feel like this is enough to be able to update our
> documentation with?
I think that would be possible. What did you have in mind?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-01-16 20:44:37 | Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-01-16 20:21:38 | Re: making the backend's json parser work in frontend code |