Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Date: 2022-02-02 18:50:17
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY4hsV+Ht8os6m4nfzvxpZLaCQ5cqhrB_e+kf9gEonRsA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:46 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Well, if someone wants to step up and provide a patch that changes 'em
> all at once, that'd be great. But we've discussed this before and
> nothing's happened.

I mean, I don't understand why it's even better. And I would go so far
as to say that if nobody can be bothered to do the work to convert
everything at once, it probably isn't better.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-02-02 18:58:15 Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2022-02-02 18:49:41 Re: Deparsing rewritten query