Re: pg_walinspect - a new extension to get raw WAL data and WAL stats

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, marvin_liang(at)qq(dot)com, actyzhang(at)outlook(dot)com
Subject: Re: pg_walinspect - a new extension to get raw WAL data and WAL stats
Date: 2022-03-10 20:00:35
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY4HYy89sgWTWgB9FPZ=S28=CDpDO73X-J7wRgd542hOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 3:22 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> * Can we mark this extension 'trusted'? I'm not 100% clear on the
> standards for that marker, but it seems reasonable for a database owner
> with the right privileges might want to install it.

I'm not clear on the standard either, exactly, but might not that
allow the database owner to get a peek at what's happening in other
databases?

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-03-10 20:21:31 Re: role self-revocation
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2022-03-10 19:58:49 Re: role self-revocation