| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_plan_advice |
| Date: | 2026-03-18 22:57:59 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY46SyAp8VgFD9hVxz+yNdfxKm_Xy=yUO3t9YMQs541mw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 6:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Well, avocet is producing the output you want, but I think the rest
> are behaving correctly given the way the script is written.
Yeah, this goes back to my "that's embarrassing" comment: obviously, I
really did not proofread this well at all.
> Anyway, I confirm that the patched output is stable with
> debug_discard_caches = 1, so LGTM.
Yeah, I also tested that here. Glad it works that way for you also.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-03-18 23:06:59 | Re: Row pattern recognition |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2026-03-18 22:51:00 | Re: Serverside SNI support in libpq |