Re: PQconninfoParse()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQconninfoParse()
Date: 2011-10-19 00:07:05
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY3dNQBjB1SBq_b6Rqj6atHUu9R=eAQbF551qYwAkO6dg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Maybe we should change this:
>
>> Note that only options explicitly specified in the string will have
>> values set in the result array; no defaults are inserted.
>
>> To say something like this:
>
>> All legal options will be present in the result array, but only those
>> explicitly specified in the string will have a corresponding value; no
>> defaults are inserted.
>
> Uh, is that actually a true statement?  I thought the result *did*
> include default values.  That's more or less the point of returning them
> all, after all.

Well, then I'm confused, because you and Dmitriy seem to be saying
opposite things.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-10-19 00:15:13 Re: description of CHECKPOINT command confusing
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-10-17 14:28:08 Re: after failover?