Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Subject: Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Date: 2014-07-07 12:24:49
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY38OBE62z5KCT+cbhVM9UN_3gve542j5VzbioJmR4fGg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com> wrote:
> In attached patch, I have moved pgpipe, piperead functions to src/port/pipe.c

If we want to consider proceeding with this approach, you should
probably separate this into a refactoring patch that doesn't do
anything but move code around and a feature patch that applies on top
of it.

(As to whether this is the right approach, I'm not sure.)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-07-07 12:39:29 Re: Cluster name in ps output
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2014-07-07 12:23:39 Re: Use unique index for longer pathkeys.