Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
Date: 2020-07-16 13:13:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY2Lmf=Wkz21rsdR2rb1EjvRjmsSKmCQk2JwY36qp4JXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 11:14 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the comments. Let me know if you think I
> have missed anything or any other comments.

If it's safe now, why not remove the error check?

(Is it safe? Could there be other problems?)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2020-07-16 13:34:19 Re: sys_siglist[] is causing us trouble again
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-07-16 13:10:45 Re: [Patch] ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY