Re: Parallel Aggregate

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Aggregate
Date: 2016-03-14 22:32:11
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY2CiFhJYt-p9xbfYvQZBAf3tb=zvNHTKotqG+4QAn+Nw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:24 PM, James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> Any chance of getting a GUC (say min_parallel_degree) added to allow setting
> the initial value of parallel_degree, then changing the small relation check
> to also pass if parallel_degree > 1?
>
> That way you could set min_parallel_degree on a query by query basis if you
> are running aggregates which you know will take a lot of CPU.
>
> I suppose it wouldn't make much sense at all to set globally though, so it
> could just confuse matters.

I kind of doubt this would work well, but somebody could write a patch
for it and try it out.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2016-03-14 22:39:36 Re: Parallel Aggregate
Previous Message James Sewell 2016-03-14 22:24:41 Re: Parallel Aggregate