| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Hale Boyes <kcboyes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: sketchy partcollation handling |
| Date: | 2017-06-06 17:09:45 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY1a-3=i89KvOybbUJGSfW2ZtJGTn5CdjFqyGuEE7qVHQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Hale Boyes <kcboyes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 6 June 2017 at 09:19, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks. Committed.
>
> The changes to catalogs.sgml has introduced a double "the" in this part of
> the sentence "this contains the OID of the the collation".
> The other section already had the double "the".
Uggh! It was just pointed out to me off-list that I credited the
wrong Kevin in the commit message for this fix. My apologies.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-06-06 17:24:59 | Re: inconsistent application_name use in logical workers |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-06 17:07:57 | Re: Should we standardize on a type for signal handler flags? |