Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Date: 2017-02-22 00:58:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY0Rjw=T-swpotmpQpzOPE9ZecOq=HZ2pjMJ9OZ4c8DVg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/10/17 15:12, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Right. I can't see why you'd want to be able to separately control
>> those two things. If you're not dumping, you don't want to load; if
>> you're not loading, you don't want to dump.
>
> What about the case where you want to prewarm a standby from the info
> from the primary (or another standby)?

I think it's OK to treat that as something of a corner case. There's
nothing to keep you from doing that today: just use pg_buffercache to
dump a list of blocks on one server, and then pass those blocks to
pg_prewarm on another server. The point of this patch, AIUI, is to
automate a particularly common case of that, which is to dump before
shutdown and load upon startup. It doesn't preclude other things that
people want to do.

I suppose we could have an SQL-callable function that does an
immediate dump (without starting a worker). That wouldn't hurt
anything, and might be useful in a case like the one you mention.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-02-22 01:01:55 Re: SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-02-21 23:16:14 Re: Json support for array pseudotypes