Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation
Date: 2019-03-29 12:18:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY0O-xSvNjJR6sH+bBrfvwEDtgkc=kzN=bZekibQ1RMiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:27 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> I used your suggestions with minor editing. After some reflection, I
> agree that the inline warnings are likely to be more effective than
> something at the end, at least for those working on a new implementation.

I'm glad we could agree on something. Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tushar 2019-03-29 12:24:30 [PG 9.6]make is failing for test_decoding contrib module.
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2019-03-29 12:15:00 Re: Online verification of checksums