From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Online checksums patch - once again |
Date: | 2019-12-05 15:13:05 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY-FAyHnr4nE_rACM8HQgK46VQsJi5Pz6ypmXetB25gEQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:41 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> Attached is a rebased v14 patchset on top of maser. The Global Barriers patch
> is left as a prerequisite, but it will obviously be dropped, or be
> significantly changed, once the work Robert is doing with ProcSignalBarrier
> lands.
Any chance you and/or Magnus could offer opinions on some of those
patches? I am reluctant to start committing things with nobody having
replied.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2019-12-05 15:28:23 | Re: Online checksums patch - once again |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-12-05 14:52:50 | Re: Allow relocatable extension to use @extschema@? |