| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | documenting the backup manifest file format |
| Date: | 2020-04-13 17:40:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY+ua-BgTNxr0Mr7FeD9uXcNwgjky1wzHzjLtWONWFRrg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:32 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I don't like having a file format that's intended to be used by external
> tools too that's undocumented except for code that assembles it in a
> piecemeal fashion. Do you mean in a follow-on patch this release, or
> later? I don't have a problem with the former.
Here is a patch for that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Document-the-backup-manifest-file-format.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2020-04-13 17:52:25 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-04-13 17:37:30 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |