Re: PGbackrest capacity related question

From: chiru r <chirupg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGbackrest capacity related question
Date: 2019-07-23 04:03:45
Message-ID: CA+RSxMh8fob3Jg15m0j91bQg=vcQ_h761qxKp46Hb_W=e+c3pg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thank you David.

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:44 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:

> On 7/22/19 5:08 PM, chiru r wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am using pgbackrest on my production workloads and it is working as
> > expected.
> > However our DB is growing more and more .
> > We have currently two disks and each one is 4 TB size. However 3.8TB
> > size data got loaded into DB currently and our /pgback mount point size
> > is 4TB.
> > So if the DB size grows more then 4TB, how to add another file system to
> > store backup under "repo-path"?.
>
> pgBackRest does not have multi-volume support because there are a number
> of ways to accomplish this using ZFS, Linux volumes, etc. You'll need
> the expand the storage for the repo using one of these methods or reduce
> your retention settings.
>
> Regards,
> --
> -David
> david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleksandr Shulgin 2019-07-23 05:30:10 Re: Queries on QMF to POSTGRE
Previous Message David Steele 2019-07-22 22:44:20 Re: PGbackrest capacity related question