From: | chiru r <chirupg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGbackrest capacity related question |
Date: | 2019-07-23 04:03:45 |
Message-ID: | CA+RSxMh8fob3Jg15m0j91bQg=vcQ_h761qxKp46Hb_W=e+c3pg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you David.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:44 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 7/22/19 5:08 PM, chiru r wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am using pgbackrest on my production workloads and it is working as
> > expected.
> > However our DB is growing more and more .
> > We have currently two disks and each one is 4 TB size. However 3.8TB
> > size data got loaded into DB currently and our /pgback mount point size
> > is 4TB.
> > So if the DB size grows more then 4TB, how to add another file system to
> > store backup under "repo-path"?.
>
> pgBackRest does not have multi-volume support because there are a number
> of ways to accomplish this using ZFS, Linux volumes, etc. You'll need
> the expand the storage for the repo using one of these methods or reduce
> your retention settings.
>
> Regards,
> --
> -David
> david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleksandr Shulgin | 2019-07-23 05:30:10 | Re: Queries on QMF to POSTGRE |
Previous Message | David Steele | 2019-07-22 22:44:20 | Re: PGbackrest capacity related question |