| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Cornelia Biacsics <cornelia(dot)biacsics(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work |
| Date: | 2025-12-08 14:54:13 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxozvGs4dA5hcKkffedBwUVET47OZLiXoztk8ON7e8ap8Jg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 14:20, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:24 AM Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> > Agreed - and companies like pgEdge and EDB have policies and often
> employment contracts that specifically encourage contributions.
>
> I'm kind of surprised by the direction of this conversation, because
> I'm aware of some problematic cases. Even if none of us were, that
> wouldn't mean that there are no problems. People are going to be
> understandably reluctant to discuss their terms of employment
> publicly.
>
I don't think she's wrong - I just think the issue is much smaller than
suggested and that there are likely better places to spend time, effort,
and money at the moment (such as, I believe, the average age of our
contributors being on the rise). More and more jurisdictions seem to be
banning non-competes (or regularly ruling against them) for employees, so
it seems to me that the problem is slowly going away anyway.
--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-12-08 16:56:55 | Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-12-08 14:20:18 | Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work |