Re: Regarding feature #3319

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Yogesh Mahajan <yogesh(dot)mahajan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding feature #3319
Date: 2025-03-13 11:07:05
Message-ID: CA+OCxoz8Yn3AkZ-OjX3==-qwiazZDdpvwUuh6_TFNuxeov3yhQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 08:31, Yogesh Mahajan <
yogesh(dot)mahajan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

> Hello Team,
>
> Couple of more questions arose during discussion -
>
> 1.What all tools should we reopen while restoration? It could be Query
> tool, ERD, Psql, Schema diff as of now may get additional in future.
>

Yes :-). Ideally, as much of the original state as possible should be
restored.

> 2.Can we use an existing crypt key to encrypt the query data or simply
> json encoding should be enough?
>

We're already storing the query history, so we should follow the precedent
there.

--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aditya Toshniwal 2025-03-13 11:07:07 Re: Role based access control discussion
Previous Message Dave Page 2025-03-13 10:57:23 Re: Role based access control discussion