Re: removing datlastsysoid

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: removing datlastsysoid
Date: 2022-05-16 13:43:16
Message-ID: CA+OCxoyt-GdtrD4J7cSDGw8Ljko5oz1j1CMH6ogA82RPpbGciA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 14:03, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 3:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > +1. Another reason to get rid of it is that it has nothing to do
> > with the system OID ranges defined in access/transam.h.
>
> Agreed. Thanks for looking. Committed.
>

So we just ran into this whilst updating pgAdmin to support PG15. How is
one supposed to figure out what the last system OID is now from an
arbitrary database? pgAdmin uses that value in well over 300 places in its
source.

--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2022-05-16 14:06:42 Re: removing datlastsysoid
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-05-16 13:25:22 Re: make MaxBackends available in _PG_init