Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?
Date: 2018-07-24 15:28:51
Message-ID: CA+OCxoxXjO3Whk9j-x=aXWduT7OVs2Jxe=kfkAMrLdy5ybc=4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> On 07/24/2018 05:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> On 2018-Jul-24, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> tldr; it's a crap ton of work, risk and uncertainty for what might well be
>>> zero benefit at the moment.
>>>
>>
>> Probably easiest way forward is to state the requirement and have
>> someone untainted by the patent come up with a clean-room
>> re-implementation.
>>
>>
> Clean room design addresses copyright-related issues, not patents.
>

Correct. It's important folks realise that!

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2018-07-24 15:32:35 Re: Making "COPY partitioned_table FROM" faster
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2018-07-24 15:28:27 Re: How can we submit code patches that implement our (pending) patents?