| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Aditya Toshniwal <aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Regarding pgAdmin browser support |
| Date: | 2022-10-06 12:38:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoxREC5ZwaZi3O6LpHttuaV1Dx-AYK9y+Bg9F1m6jFLd5w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi
On Thu, 6 Oct 2022 at 13:24, Aditya Toshniwal <
aditya(dot)toshniwal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Hackers,
>
> The current browser support is quite outdated -
> https://www.pgadmin.org/faq/#11 and most modern libraries like (
> https://mui.com/) MUIv5 do not even support them.
> That said, we should reconsider the min browser version supported to at
> least allow moving MUI v4 to v5.
> As per migration guide https://mui.com/guides/migration-v4/, the minimum
> browser version supported are:
> Chrome 90 (up from 49)
>
2021-04-14
> Edge 91 (up from 14)
>
2021-05-27
> Firefox 78 (up from 52)
>
2020-06-30
> Safari 14 (macOS) and 12.5 (iOS) (up from 10).
>
2020-09-16
So the youngest one of those is still over a year old. Which I think is
fine.
>
> The only problem is pgAdmin supports macOS 10.15 which ships Safari 15.
> But since we're shipping with NWjs, the users of this should be negligible.
>
I'm not sure why that's a problem, given that MUI supports Safari 14+?
--
Dave Page
Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aditya Toshniwal | 2022-10-06 12:58:58 | Re: Regarding pgAdmin browser support |
| Previous Message | Aditya Toshniwal | 2022-10-06 12:23:26 | Regarding pgAdmin browser support |