| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Anthony Presley <anthony(at)resolution(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Infinite Cache |
| Date: | 2011-07-02 08:20:33 |
| Message-ID: | CA+OCxoxHZjfp7cAOTRLzSWbR_MKWNpuJZQ4zF=UwkcSrVFfUfg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Anthony Presley wrote:
>> Was curious if there was some sort of Open Source version of Infinite Cache, and/or a memcache layer that can be "dropped" in front of PostgreSQL without application changes (which seems to be the "key" piece of Infinite Cache), or is this something that EnterpriseDB owns and you have to buy their version of the software to use?
>
> There had been some talk at one point about getting the backend-changes to support Infinite Cache into mainline Postgres. If that ever happened you could build your own version of it.
>
> BTW, thanks to the compression feature of IC I've heard it can actually be beneficial to run it on the same server.
Correct.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Radhya sahal | 2011-07-03 04:13:54 | How can retrieve total query run-time with out using explain |
| Previous Message | Samuel Gendler | 2011-07-02 00:51:32 | Re: near identical queries have vastly different plans |