Re: Planet posting policy

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planet posting policy
Date: 2012-02-01 09:34:10
Message-ID: CA+OCxox2SCDYOsgyJ2qoXECk2RzQOyy74W78A5nJzyzVgZuE3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I think that blog post itself is a very good example of content we
> *don't* necessarily want on planet.

As written. I don't think it's a million miles off though.

> It's too bad you didn't write a version that had the technical detali
> and was less marketing/pressrelease:y to compare with :-) Because
> AIUI, you don't actually suggest changing the policies as far as to
> allow that post as it is - it would've allowed the modified version
> only?

Correct - though I would have described the basic features of course,
as would be necessary to give the appropriate context to the technical
detail.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2012-02-01 09:40:56 Re: Planet posting policy
Previous Message Gabriele Bartolini 2012-01-31 18:42:19 Issues with SMTP on Horde