Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Cornelia Biacsics <cornelia(dot)biacsics(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
Date: 2025-12-08 13:23:57
Message-ID: CA+OCxowxEj2=6PvofPHy_azBsv3p_k8jkB_jaFnRq2Tw6iQv2g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 11:43, Umair Shahid <umair(dot)shahid(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 8:58 PM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 11:27 AM Cornelia Biacsics <
>> cornelia(dot)biacsics(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 1. Do you see this as an issue the PostgreSQL community should
>>> discuss?
>>>
>>> No. I've seen no examples of this. The Postgres ecosystem is thriving,
>> and people jump jobs from one employer to another with no friction right
>> now.
>>
>
> +1
>
> I have not seen any examples of non-compete clauses that prevent the
> person from contributing to PostgreSQL. The clauses that I have seen &
> experienced are designed to prevent poaching.
>

Agreed - and companies like pgEdge and EDB have policies and often
employment contracts that specifically encourage contributions.

--
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
pgEdge: https://www.pgedge.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-12-08 14:20:18 Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
Previous Message Umair Shahid 2025-12-08 11:43:23 Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work