Re: PATCH: EXTENSION keyword not supported by pgAdmin3

The contents of the extensions are in public, but the comments are part of
the extension itself (ie. the "package"), so don't they also live outside
of any schema like the extension itself?

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Ashesh Vashi
<ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>wrote:

> Aren't they installed in that schema?
> --
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Ashesh Vashi
> EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>
>
>
> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Ashesh Vashi <
>> ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Ashesh Vashi
>>>> <ashesh(dot)vashi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi Dave,
>>>> >
>>>> > Please find the patch for the supporting the EXTENSION keyword in the
>>>> > frmRestore dialog.
>>>> >
>>>> > Description:
>>>> > ============
>>>> > If User perform back up database with supported format like custom
>>>> and tar,
>>>> > it taken successfully. While browse the particular file on Restore
>>>> database
>>>> > and Click on display object, an error occurred while schema node is
>>>> not
>>>> > found.
>>>>
>>>> Something's not quite right - it's showing my table under an extension
>>>> node!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah - that was a typical "Copy/Paste" error.
>>> PFA - the updated patch.
>>>
>>>
>> Slightly better. Now the extension comments are shown under the public
>> schema.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company