From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time? |
Date: | 2012-04-25 19:37:04 |
Message-ID: | CA+OCxow10vWthTY_A7epLmDZ9DcjqPLVW0W5NQ0uki09bFpUow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Would it be reasonable to shoot for wrapping 9.2beta1 next week?
>>> (That would mean a wrap on Thursday May 3, if we follow the usual
>>> type of release schedule.)
>
>> I doubt we'll be able to produce installers that soon - first, we're
>> still building the build VMs for 9.2, and second, right now we're
>> having to update every existing build VM and then the 8.3 through 9.1
>> installers (which will require more QA than normal because of the
>> changes) due to the recent OpenSSL bug.
>
> Mmm. How about two weeks from tomorrow, then? If we don't make that,
> we won't have a beta till after PGCon, which would be a shame.
That's probably achievable (putting together the build machines is no
small task). Worst case; the installers come out a few days later than
the source code. It's a first beta, so it wouldn't be the end of the
world.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-04-25 20:04:53 | Request to add options to tools/git_changelog |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-04-25 19:29:08 | Re: 9.2 release notes, beta time? |