Re: Exposing the stats snapshot timestamp to SQL

From: Matt Kelly <mkellycs(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Exposing the stats snapshot timestamp to SQL
Date: 2015-01-30 00:08:58
Message-ID: CA+KcUkg+XS_POgzbikeBUcDkz5X+cU33q4WZvOD-gYionmQndw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This is now: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/4/128/

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:01 PM, Matt Kelly <mkellycs(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Robert, I'll add it to the commitfest.
>
> Jim, I'm not sure I understand what you mean? This new function follows
> the same conventions as everything else in the file. TimestampTz is just a
> typedef for int64. Functions like pg_stat_get_buf_alloc follow the exact
> same pattern on the int64 fields of the global stats struct.
>
> - Matt K.
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:49 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/28/15 11:18 PM, Matt Kelly wrote:
>>
>>> In a previous thread Tom Lane said:
>>>
>>> (I'm also wondering if it'd make sense to expose the stats timestamp
>>> as a callable function, so that the case could be dealt with
>>> programmatically as well. But that's future-feature territory.)
>>>
>>> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27251.1421684169@sss.pgh.pa.us)
>>>
>>> It seemed the appropriate scope for my first submission, and that
>>> feature has been on my wish list for a while, so I thought I'd grab it.
>>>
>>
>> I've reviewed the patch (though haven't tested it myself) and it looks
>> good. The only thing I'm not sure of is this:
>>
>> + /* Get the timestamp of the current statistics snapshot */
>> + Datum
>> + pg_stat_snapshot_timestamp(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
>> + {
>> + PG_RETURN_TIMESTAMPTZ(pgstat_fetch_global()->stats_timestamp);
>> + }
>>
>> Is the community OK with referencing stats_timestamp that way?
>> --
>> Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
>> Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
>>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2015-01-30 00:25:59 Re: pg_upgrade and rsync
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-01-30 00:07:30 Re: pg_upgrade and rsync