Re: Speed up COPY FROM text/CSV parsing using SIMD

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 05:25, KAZAR Ayoub <ma_kazar(at)esi(dot)dz> wrote:
> >
> > Following Nazir's findings about 4096 bytes being the performant line
> length, I did more benchmarks from my side on both TEXT and CSV formats
> with two different cases of normal data (no special characters) and data
> with many special characters.
> >
> > Results are con good as expected and similar to previous benchmarks
> > ~30.9% faster copy in TEXT format
> > ~32.4% faster copy in CSV format
> > 20%-30% reduces cycles per instructions
> >
> > In the case of doing a lot of special characters in the lines (e.g.,
> tables with large numbers of columns maybe), we obviously expect
> regressions here because of the overhead of many fallbacks to scalar
> processing.
> > Results for a 1/3 of line length of special characters:
> > ~43.9% slower copy in TEXT format
> > ~16.7% slower copy in CSV format
> > So for even less occurrences of special characters or wider distance
> between there might still be some regressions in this case, a
> non-significant case maybe, but can be treated in other patches if we
> consider to not use SIMD path sometimes.
> >
> > I hope this helps more and confirms the patch.
>
> Thanks for running that benchmark! Would you mind sharing a reproducer
> for the regression you observed?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Nazir Bilal Yavuz
> Microsoft

Of course, I attached the sql to generate the text and csv test files.
If having a 1/3 of line length of special characters can be an
exaggeration, something lower might still reproduce some regressions of
course for the same idea.

Best regards,
Ayoub Kazar