Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
Date: 2019-12-24 01:59:45
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHoNKn3HBb0yZ9sCZu=GL_KxrXAFiYygLTgS95DBOcZTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 6:33 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > One thing I see is that you chose to relocate RelationGetPartitionDesc's
> > declaration to partdesc.h, whereupon RelationBuildPartitionDesc doesn't
> > have to be exported at all anymore. Perhaps that's a better factorization
> > than what I did. It supposes that any caller of RelationGetPartitionDesc
> > is going to need partdesc.h, but that seems reasonable. We could likewise
> > move RelationGetPartitionKey to partcache.h.
>
> I concluded that that is indeed a better solution; it does allow removing
> some rel.h inclusions (though possibly those were just duplicative?), and
> it also means that relcache.c itself doesn't need any partitioning
> inclusions at all.
>
> Here's a cleaned-up patch that does it like that and also fixes the
> memory leakage issue.

Thanks for the updated patch. I didn't find anything to complain about.

> I haven't removed equalPartitionDescs here; that seems like material
> for a separate patch (to make it easier to put it back if we need it).

Seems like a good idea.

Btw, does the memory leakage fix in this patch address any of the
pending concerns that were discussed on the "hyrax vs.
RelationBuildPartitionDesc" thread earlier this year[1]?

Thanks,
Amit

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3800.1560366716%40sss.pgh.pa.us#092b6b4f6bf75d2f3f90ef6a3b3eab5b

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo Nagata 2019-12-24 02:01:48 Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2019-12-24 01:24:28 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number