Re: a comment in joinrel.c: compute_partition_bounds()

Fujita-san,

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:41 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:20 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:34 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I think there's a word missing in the following comment:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * See if the partition bounds for inputs are exactly the same, in
> > > * which case we don't need to work hard: the join rel have the same
> > > * partition bounds as inputs, and the partitions with the same
> > > * cardinal positions form the pairs.
> > >
> > > ": the join rel have the same..." seems to be missing a "will".
> > >
> > > Attached a patch to fix.
> >
> > Good catch! Will fix.
>
> Rereading the comment, I think it would be better to add “will” to the
> second part “the partitions with the same cardinal positions form the
> pairs” as well. Updated patch attached.

No objection from my side.

Thank you.

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com