| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comment typo in namespace.c |
| Date: | 2016-01-06 15:34:21 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqHeCRcq2XCVQ=W1huu250VGqvG0qMQZ_7sYDe=eecXNtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> Attached fixes a typo: s/non-exstant/non-existant.
>> Alternatively, it could be spelled as 'existent' but the patch doesn't.
>
> "non-existant" is flat wrong, so if we're going to fix typos, let's
> fix them to actually be English.
So, non-existent? non-extant? I seems to me like an 's' accidentally
sneaked in when the author of the comment tried to write the latter
spelling. But the former sounds more familiar (at least to me).
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-01-06 15:41:12 | Re: Add numeric_trim(numeric) |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2016-01-06 15:21:32 | Re: Add numeric_trim(numeric) |