Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
Date: 2019-06-07 04:02:56
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHdDXbUEKJwC5zWAmvD5706Voj13QsVc76jkOWxJZVcFw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 3:47 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> While it's
> problematic that the session in which a new partition is attached to
> the parent relation broadcasts 2 SI messages to invalidate the parent
> relation [1], it's obviously better to fix how RelationClearRelation
> manipulates rd_pdoldcxt so that duplicate SI messages are not harmful,
> fixing the latter is hardly an option.

Sorry, I had meant to say "fixing the former/the other is hardly an option".

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-07 04:23:20 Re: coverage additions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-07 02:29:49 Re: Custom table AMs need to include heapam.h because of BulkInsertState