Re: set relispartition when attaching child index

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: set relispartition when attaching child index
Date: 2019-04-24 15:55:31
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHbBfFgqTtdwKeBzA5XaUC6Didq7+fNkNztJ9RtVW+7Nw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:39 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:38 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 12:35 AM Alvaro Herrera
> > <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On 2019-Apr-25, Amit Langote wrote:
> > >
> > > > It seems that DefineIndex() is forgetting to update_relispartition()
> > > > on a partition's index when it's attached to an index being added to
> > > > the parent. That results in unexpected behavior when adding a foreign
> > > > key referencing the parent.
> > >
> > > BTW, maybe IndexSetParentIndex ought to be the one calling
> > > update_relispartition() ...
> >
> > I thought so too, but other sites are doing what I did in the patch.
>
> Although, we wouldn't have this bug if it was IndexSetParentIndex
> calling it. Maybe a good idea to do that now.

I tried that in the attached.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
IndexSetParentIndex-update_relispartition.patch application/octet-stream 4.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-04-24 15:58:59 Re: block-level incremental backup
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-04-24 15:39:52 Re: set relispartition when attaching child index