Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_get_publication_tables() output duplicate relid
Date: 2021-11-24 06:32:04
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHX8LzgDfWM4-ZKzNFgQxMqnfUBRa4YghQkJDtoW6Ou7Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:21 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Isn't it better to document this case and explain what
> users can expect instead of trying to design a solution around this?

I thought about the problems you've described and it looks like I
hadn't considered many of the details which complicate implementing a
solution for this.

So yeah, documenting the ATTACH issue as a limitation sounds like the
best course for now. I might word it as follows and add it under
Notes at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createpublication.html:

"ATTACHing a table into a partition tree whose root is published using
a publication with publish_via_partition_root set to true does not
result in the table's existing contents to be replicated."

I'm not sure there's a clean enough workaround to this that we can add
to the paragraph.

Does that make sense?

> Even if we do so the streaming after attach partition problem as
> discussed above should be fixed.

I agree. I have reproduced the problem though haven't managed to pin
down the cause yet.

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-11-24 06:45:45 Re: parallel vacuum comments
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-11-24 06:18:59 Re: parallel vacuum comments