| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #18830: ExecInitMerge Segfault on MERGE |
| Date: | 2025-03-13 12:44:44 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqH6g+AFpxczPPB-gyhbqiPqSa=V0j-_T15JomtbxpU6hA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 4:29 PM Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> 于2025年3月13日周四 03:23写道：
>> It does mean that ExecGetRangeTableRelation() needs to allow pruned
>> relations to be opened, if called from ExecInitResultRelation(). I
>> think that's OK because the check for opening pruned relations still
>> applies to scan relations.
>
> A comment in execPartition.h may need to be changed:
> * partrel Partitioned table Relation; obtained by
> * ExecGetRangeTableRelation(estate, rti), where
>
> Because the func interface has changed, the above comments are better to be changed "ExecGetRangeTableRelation(estate, rti, false)".
Noted, thanks.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2025-03-13 14:42:10 | Re: BUG #18830: ExecInitMerge Segfault on MERGE |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2025-03-13 12:44:09 | Re: BUG #18830: ExecInitMerge Segfault on MERGE |