Re: remaining sql/json patches

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: remaining sql/json patches
Date: 2024-03-27 04:34:50
Message-ID: CA+HiwqH-5rt1DDDzoeFDZQ5TdguitQjFE0m7c-PjzOKszfjECA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 12:42 PM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> hi.
> I don't fully understand all the code in json_table patch.
> maybe we can split it into several patches,

I'm working on exactly that atm.

> like:
> * no nested json_table_column.
> * nested json_table_column, with PLAN DEFAULT
> * nested json_table_column, with PLAN ( json_table_plan )

Yes, I think it will end up something like this. I'll try to post the
breakdown tomorrow.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2024-03-27 04:38:33 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Previous Message jian he 2024-03-27 03:41:50 Re: remaining sql/json patches