| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: remaining sql/json patches |
| Date: | 2023-12-14 08:05:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqGuq4fz1Pq42o3oBUR+kewAWf71YV0dNb0pTWbWa1J1SA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 2:05 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> On 2023-12-08 Fr 11:37, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:59 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Would it be messy to replace the lookahead approach by whatever's
> >> suiable *in the future* when it becomes necessary to do so?
> > It might be. Changing grammar rules to tends to change corner-case
> > behavior if nothing else. We're best off picking the approach that we
> > think is correct long term.
>
> All this makes me wonder if Alvaro's first suggested solution (adding
> NESTED to the UNBOUNDED precedence level) wouldn't be better after all.
I've done just that in the latest v32.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2023-12-14 08:10:38 | Re: remaining sql/json patches |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2023-12-14 08:04:46 | Re: remaining sql/json patches |