Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Skip partition tuple routing with constant partition key
Date: 2022-04-06 03:37:51
Message-ID: CA+HiwqGgAcYF=EPXJeDo=-6z_Mg+aMJPYU-mJdfVOzfPcxt+QQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 10:31 PM Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> Is this a problem with the patch or its tests?
>
> [18:14:20.798] # poll_query_until timed out executing this query:
> [18:14:20.798] # SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription_rel WHERE
> srsubstate NOT IN ('r', 's');
> [18:14:20.798] # expecting this output:
> [18:14:20.798] # t
> [18:14:20.798] # last actual query output:
> [18:14:20.798] # f
> [18:14:20.798] # with stderr:
> [18:14:20.798] # Tests were run but no plan was declared and
> done_testing() was not seen.
> [18:14:20.798] # Looks like your test exited with 60 just after 31.
> [18:14:20.798] [18:12:21] t/013_partition.pl .................
> [18:14:20.798] Dubious, test returned 60 (wstat 15360, 0x3c00)
> ...
> [18:14:20.798] Test Summary Report
> [18:14:20.798] -------------------
> [18:14:20.798] t/013_partition.pl (Wstat: 15360 Tests: 31 Failed: 0)
> [18:14:20.798] Non-zero exit status: 60
> [18:14:20.798] Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
> [18:14:20.798] Files=32, Tests=328, 527 wallclock secs ( 0.16 usr 0.09
> sys + 99.81 cusr 87.08 csys = 187.14 CPU)
> [18:14:20.798] Result: FAIL

Hmm, make check-world passes for me after rebasing the patch (v10) to
the latest HEAD (clean), nor do I see a failure on cfbot:

http://cfbot.cputube.org/amit-langote.html

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2022-04-06 03:54:42 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-04-06 03:30:44 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v69