| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lucas Jeffrey <luquijeffrey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Two more RI fast-path issues |
| Date: | 2026-10-20 01:45:23 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqGQYtEpAUz85h=edDtzPPi+RNf1KxniAp3mOcp7CP1nUg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 9:49 Lucas Jeffrey <luquijeffrey(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Amit
> About the reentrant RI check that frees a plan already in use, in this
> thread I already created a fix and it had a backfix for all supported
> branches:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAGHzy7S0XfXdK3amd5c4QhpS1o9dySVzPr+-d9ohaE4iV_vNog(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com
>
> It has this entry in the current commitfest:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6825/
Ah, thanks for reminding me of it. I didn’t realize it’s chasing the same
issue essentially.
I’ll take a look and reply over there.
- Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ZizhuanLiu X-MAN | 2026-10-20 01:47:20 | Re: Optimize MCV stats for sortable types and utilize sorted-order properties |
| Previous Message | Gustavo William | 2026-10-20 01:44:01 | Re: enhancing pg_basebackup speeds up to ~23Gbps (small fixes + io_uring/Direct I/O) |