Re: table partition and column default

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: table partition and column default
Date: 2019-12-25 08:47:38
Message-ID: CA+HiwqG7O1Gnfaz_JGidSQEbjAdGiypgXdE=FkAW_7mDxDaBdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 5:40 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 1:56 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > IIRC, there was some discussion about implementing a feature whereby
> > partition's default will used for an attribute if it's null even after
> > considering the parent table's default, that is, when no default value
> > is defined in the parent. The details are at toward the end of this
> > thread:
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/578398af46350effe7111895a4856b87b02e000e.camel%402ndquadrant.com
>
> Thanks for pointing that thread!
>
> As you mentioned in that thread, I also think that this current
> behavior (maybe restriction) should be documented.
> What about adding the note like "a partition's default value is
> not applied when inserting a tuple through a partitioned table."
> into the document?

Agreed.

> Patch attached.

Thanks for creating the patch, looks good to me.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maksim Milyutin 2019-12-25 09:34:22 Re: Disallow cancellation of waiting for synchronous replication
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2019-12-25 08:40:16 Re: table partition and column default