From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: dubious error message from partition.c |
Date: | 2017-08-11 03:22:07 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqG7LoAqsaU43gm8KGcwYkzfr18s4L+Yd6t=ZfjT9kEeRw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(Sorry Robert for the duplicate message, I mistakenly didn't hit Reply All)
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:54 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> >> That seems like overkill. I'm good with "greater than or equal to".
> >
> > Attached updated patch has "greater than or equal to".
>
> Committed, with one small change which I hope will be considered an
> improvement. Your proposed primary error message was:
>
> invalid range bound specification for partition \"%s\"
>
> I changed it to:
>
> empty range bound specified for partition \"%s\"
>
> Thanks for working on this.
Thank for committing. The new message is certainly an improvement.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-11 04:05:27 | coverage analysis improvements |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2017-08-11 03:03:40 | Re: WIP: Failover Slots |