Hi,
Before I dig into the patch properly after the weekend, one question
on the report itself: has anyone traced why the old path runs away on
memory? We've characterized it as missing-var, then null, then
evaluation continues, then OOM, but I don't think the actual growing
allocation has been pinned down. Mostly want to understand whether the
same runaway is reachable without a missing variable, since raising
the error early wouldn't catch those cases.
- Thanks, Amit