From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: a curious case of force_parallel_mode = on with jit'ing |
Date: | 2021-02-04 05:45:34 |
Message-ID: | CA+HiwqG2xspusrA2Xs8ogCkCFmE5V0KkOL6ra+jEzTxy5O2YEQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:41 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:08 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Works for me on HEAD (using RHEL8.3, gcc 8.3.1, LLVM 10.0.1).
>
> > Thanks for checking. Must be my LLVM setup I guess:
>
> > $ llvm-config --version
> > 7.0.1
> > $ cat /etc/redhat-release
> > CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core)
> > $ gcc --version
> > gcc (GCC) 9.1.1 20190605 (Red Hat 9.1.1-2)
>
> Hmmm ... seems like an odd combination to have a newer gcc and an
> older LLVM than what RHEL8 is shipping. Is this really the current
> recommendation on CentOS 7?
Not an official combination. At some point last year I decided to
install a more modern gcc than what CentOS 7 officially provides and
ended up getting them through a Software Collections (scl) package
called devtoolset-9.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-02-04 06:00:09 | Re: Can we have a new SQL callable function to get Postmaster PID? |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-02-04 05:43:39 | Re: pg_replication_origin_drop API potential race condition |