Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com
Subject: Re: ModifyTable overheads in generic plans
Date: 2020-06-29 01:17:18
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFoeEkO8X9R3KVLpxCmzALQC7HPTVDt4oRktb7ahMaEnw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:36 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I would like to discuss a refactoring patch that builds on top of the
> patches at [1] to address $subject.

I've added this to the next CF: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/28/2621/

--
Amit Langote
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-06-29 01:20:57 Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-06-29 00:40:16 Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk