Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Date: 2021-09-03 23:17:33
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFnAwNCO0ty4+NZDq_k2RTZEjZ7Wd5FWJvkT7za05KnmQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 3:10 Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:

> On Fri, 2021-09-03 at 18:24 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > > On 6 Apr 2021, at 09:46, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 11:36 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > I don't know if Seamus is still working on that; if not, we might
> > > > mark it as "returned with feedback".
> > >
> > > I have to agree given the time left.
> >
> > This thread has stalled and the patch no longer applies. I propose that
> we
> > mark this Returned with Feedback, is that Ok with you Amit?
>
> +1. That requires more thought.

Yes, I think so too.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2021-09-03 23:21:59 Re: [PATCH] test/ssl: rework the sslfiles Makefile target
Previous Message Andres Freund 2021-09-03 21:54:33 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints