Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Date: 2021-07-07 07:12:49
Message-ID: CA+HiwqFkcDZeOH0tC05YWKbCByD8dG6TkYODKcc5awK2Qxj_5Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 1:41 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 at 12:41, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'll mark the CF entry as WoA, unless you'd rather I just mark it RwF.
>
> I've set it to waiting on author. It was still set to needs review.

Sorry it slipped my mind to do that and thanks.

> If you think you'll not get time to write the patch during this CF,
> feel free to bump it out.

I will try to post an update next week if not later this week,
hopefully with an updated patch.

--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-07-07 07:13:58 Re: trivial improvement to system_or_bail
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-07-07 07:11:25 Re: 回复: Why is XLOG_FPI_FOR_HINT always need backups?