| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Evan Montgomery-Recht <montge(at)mianetworks(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Eliminating SPI / SQL from some RI triggers - take 3 |
| Date: | 2026-04-10 07:39:16 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqFh_CMi95g2-W259i216_MxDMuOUcR+vrA8VqSTf8KLXA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 7:26 PM Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 0001 and 0002 look good to me. I didn’t review 0003 and don’t intend to review it.
I've now pushed 0001 (34a3078629) and 0002 (d6e96bacd3c).
Here's the remaning patch to add src/test/modules/test_spi_resowner
rebased against master. I'm holding off on committing the test module
until I confirm the policy on new test modules during feature freeze.
It's also worth discussing whether this is the right place for testing
C extensions that use SPI with a dedicated resource owner, or whether
that coverage belongs elsewhere.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v5-0001-Add-test-module-for-RI-fast-path-FK-checks-under-.patch | application/octet-stream | 17.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-04-10 07:40:31 | Re: Add errdetail() with PID and UID about source of termination signal |
| Previous Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2026-04-10 07:36:04 | Re: Re: Bug: WAIT FOR LSN crashes with assertion failure inside PL/pgSQL DO blocks and procedures |