Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert
Date: 2026-10-14 22:55:24
Message-ID: CA+HiwqF59JfzhwfnQMktERWa4ySc6atk3BFdTKK82Vo=xc3fkA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 0:08 Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 7, 2026 at 10:04 AM Matheus Alcantara
> <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On 07/10/26 08:47, Amit Langote wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the new version. I've tested v2 and it looks good to me.
> >
> > > I'll push 0001 and 0002 tomorrow barring objections.
> > >
> >
> > +1 from me.
>
> What are the status of these patches? Have they been committed?

No, they have not. I’ll commit these today.

- Amit

>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-10-14 22:55:34 Re: pgstat: allow a stats kind to use its own dedicated dsa/dshash
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-10-14 22:51:54 Re: [PG19] btree_gin misses rows for a timestamptz bound in the repeated DST hour