| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: dropping column prevented due to inherited index |
| Date: | 2019-10-08 09:25:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqEn+LAmTNN7oJC4a05N0ai6ymxxwxAKpAT=_1P_ZJdkbQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 6:15 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Apologies for not helping much here; I'm on vacation for a couple of
> weeks.
No worries, please take your time.
> On 2019-Oct-08, Amit Langote wrote:
>
> > I couldn't imagine how that trick could be implemented for this case. :(
>
> Can't we pass around an ObjectAddresses pointer to which each recursion
> level adds the object(s) it wants to delete, and in the outermost level
> we drop everything in it? I vaguely recall we implemented something
> like that somewhere within the past year, but all I can find is
> 20bef2c3110a.
I thought about doing something like that, but wasn't sure if
introducing that much complexity is warranted.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ants Aasma | 2019-10-08 09:38:43 | Re: Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and encrypted files |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-10-08 09:15:05 | Re: dropping column prevented due to inherited index |