Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Date: 2022-12-21 10:47:24
Message-ID: CA+HiwqEdJn7WNueDCFwQ_28-tMJ6_71WOFdm3B9=iyyhy7K1yw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 7:18 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> This version of the patch looks not entirely unreasonable to me. I'll
> set this as Ready for Committer in case David or Tom or someone else
> want to have a look and potentially commit it.

Thank you, Alvaro.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2022-12-21 11:32:39 Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-12-21 10:18:46 Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning