| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Batching in executor |
| Date: | 2025-12-04 15:54:29 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqEPMwhg6pUE4XML2rG4fRqKMpeGTtMwRPGes90f9iOqtg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 3:37 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:40 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > That would be nice to see if you have the time, but maybe after I post
> > a new version.
>
> I’ve created a CF entry marked WoA for this in the next CF under the
> title “Batching in executor, part 1: add batch variant of table AM
> scan API.” The idea is to track this piece separately so that later
> parts can have their own entries and we don’t end up with a single
> long-lived entry that never gets marked done. :-)
I intend to continue working on this, so have just moved it into the
next fest. I will post a new patch version next week that addresses
Daniil's comments and implements a few other things I mentioned I will
in my reply to Tomas on Oct 28; sorry for the delay.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-12-04 15:56:12 | Re: pgsql: Add pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u64 |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-12-04 15:51:10 | Re: pgsql: Add pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u64 |