Re: Batching in executor

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Batching in executor
Date: 2025-12-04 15:54:29
Message-ID: CA+HiwqEPMwhg6pUE4XML2rG4fRqKMpeGTtMwRPGes90f9iOqtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 3:37 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:40 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > That would be nice to see if you have the time, but maybe after I post
> > a new version.
>
> I’ve created a CF entry marked WoA for this in the next CF under the
> title “Batching in executor, part 1: add batch variant of table AM
> scan API.” The idea is to track this piece separately so that later
> parts can have their own entries and we don’t end up with a single
> long-lived entry that never gets marked done. :-)

I intend to continue working on this, so have just moved it into the
next fest. I will post a new patch version next week that addresses
Daniil's comments and implements a few other things I mentioned I will
in my reply to Tomas on Oct 28; sorry for the delay.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-12-04 15:56:12 Re: pgsql: Add pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u64
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-12-04 15:51:10 Re: pgsql: Add pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u64